Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82537 invoked from network); 19 May 2010 13:19:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 May 2010 13:19:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 15513 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2010 13:19:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 15484 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2010 13:19:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 15476 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2010 13:19:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:19:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.200 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.200] (HELO mail-yw0-f200.google.com) (209.85.211.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:19:49 +0000 Received: by ywh38 with SMTP id 38so5322869ywh.29 for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 06:19:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=e4LyhitCuElqau6DJRorDTtyg3BmN5SXp1O/lsNoyXA=; b=iUrmecstA+OJ3tb1bE9xsQc9pi5hypOdehp1TuaXBrbcTITEUaU8wg4h2hxYwjBB6X jQzIrHGhqiF+fwwWqUQ5fwASoy8HCYhMAyU3G6Rpu1tS3vf1AJTp2LOOc0FBrGXOCvRu H0tlv4KxsBIBDQfz8SVtX4yjhi37U0jR8wQho= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=AGCZJlB4dhRgDgitHPEzL7UayV0i4/ZTOSGuLwsdx0Wl6vzICz7Zskjo/QScF+K5F3 LXqNpg1Hda6f2Iz7U47AIslPGHjImnI0P1ZG691iXlog/qGp22Wc4/REgdUTM0VOHgxY Xfdvnm8illsYFNQmEVxq/bD6c2UEF+TuATauA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.24.4 with SMTP id b4mr9254582ybj.335.1274275168680; Wed, 19 May 2010 06:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.82.2 with HTTP; Wed, 19 May 2010 06:19:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28607920.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <015901caf5ae$f6e07420$e4a15c60$@de> <28607920.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 14:19:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ActiveMQ freeze From: Gary Tully To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd286a2c67a800486f24eca --000e0cd286a2c67a800486f24eca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The master is blocked on a write, is some consumer having trouble? Would be interested to know the state of the process on the other end of that connection. That pending write is blocking the next message dispatch on that connection= . "ActiveMQ Connection Dispatcher: /127.0.0.1:59497" daemon prio=3D10 tid=3D0x00000000486fa000 nid=3D0xcd0 runnable [0x000000004152c000..0x000000004152ca90] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite0(Native Method) at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite(Unknown Source) at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(Unknown Source) at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpBufferedOutputStream.flush(TcpBuffered= OutputStream.java:115) at java.io.DataOutputStream.flush(Unknown Source) at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.oneway(TcpTransport.java:181= ) at org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.oneway(InactivityMonitor.ja= va:243) - locked <0x00002aaadca9dc98> (a java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean) at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.oneway(TransportFilter.java:8= 5) at org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.oneway(WireFormatNegotia= tor.java:104) at org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:40) - locked <0x00002aaadca9ded8> (a java.lang.Object) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.dispatch(TransportConnection= .java:1224) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processDispatch(TransportCon= nection.java:802) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.iterate(TransportConnection.= java:838) at org.apache.activemq.thread.DedicatedTaskRunner.runTask(DedicatedTaskRunner.= java:98) at org.apache.activemq.thread.DedicatedTaskRunner$1.run(DedicatedTaskRunner.ja= va:36) On 19 May 2010 14:02, Christian grobmeier wrote: > > I am a collegue of Andreas. It happened again on tuesday but again we don= 't > know the reasons. Attached are two thread dumps. I cannot see anything in > it, but maybe you are seeing more. > http://old.nabble.com/file/p28607920/dumps.zip dumps.zip > > We had also problems with KahaDB before which forced us to upgrade to thi= s > snapshot. But now I am tending to go back to Version 5.3. Are there other > reports of this kind with this 5.4.x series? > > Christian > > > Gary Tully wrote: > > > > If you can capture some thread dumps of both the master and slave > brokers, > > ideally a small series, with few seconds between each this would help > > determine what is going on. > > > > Obviously, if this is repeatable, please open a jira issue to track it > and > > add your test case if you can. > > > > > > On 17 May 2010 11:51, Andreas Pr=FCller wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> > >> > >> currently I have an ActiveMQ 5.4-SNAPSHOT running for a test. It is as > >> pure > >> master-slave configured. > >> > >> Last Friday the whole system stopped working =96 I mean no new message= s > >> were > >> enqueued, no messages were dequeued. No exception was thrown, no > warning, > >> nothing. It just stopped working (and there were some hundred messages > on > >> the queues which had to be processed). > >> > >> In the log file of the ActiveMQ (master and slave) I can see it was > still > >> running, as it cleaned up the kahadb regularly. > >> > >> Only solution was at the end to stop the whole system and restart it. > >> > >> > >> > >> Anybody any idea what happened there? > >> > >> > >> > >> Hope somebody can help. > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Andreas > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > http://blog.garytully.com > > > > Open Source Integration > > http://fusesource.com > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-freeze-tp28581838p28607920.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --=20 http://blog.garytully.com Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com --000e0cd286a2c67a800486f24eca--