Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26730 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 17:00:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 17:00:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 25044 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 17:00:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 25019 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 17:00:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 25011 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 17:00:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:00:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jamiemccrindle@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.225] (HELO mail-bw0-f225.google.com) (209.85.218.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:00:11 +0000 Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so2924670bwz.8 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:59:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zQ7PPAgiTmKn3la87cJbjFF7rS7ZM3jwGuQ5mUHLKyA=; b=oTcpFziKZ3oDz/uMj21CPTS5M3rQY9gP5ZvC0OeOKk2ykHU4D22TEG/umrg8wjnALE Bftb41DV1FgIkAIWrqiikQc1qbBb/2RFijOv9svls4hnBgkUdW/Dw9pk6SyQlNym7yXw rpaG53MjsZNPNcMa7mhsLG7Z5eQqx32iNV4J8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=GRcvGPIITAwP/kP6L5ZY04O9r79i1cMPIDsrBL+qOtaUpcUfVZT7R8DmtHG1J7NL5q qSzgHAm6+fF9Ev5PrF5z2tWthP4ijilWBOwj+LaZrJbAjgy/VwHCfyR/JSLX5WwWqfGM 6z4extr1cc2gUMjf3+iZNnkyacf7ETuXmzbKk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.177.80 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:59:50 +0100 Received: by 10.239.165.9 with SMTP id v9mr115029hbd.152.1271437190292; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Network of Brokers From: Jamie McCrindle To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001485f794de14e58304845d8a12 --001485f794de14e58304845d8a12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hiya, We've been getting an issue with using a static Network of Brokers where if we publish something to broker 1, it doesn't get picked up by broker 2. We've tried various values for dynamicOnly, networkTTL and prefetchSize. I've attached a test case that, assuming I've written it correctly, highlights the issue. I can raise it in JIRA but I thought I'd send it to the message list first in case I've done something obviously wrong. I'm using ActiveMQ 5.3.1 cheers, j. --001485f794de14e58304845d8a12--