Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70250 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 22:00:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 22:00:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 20241 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 22:00:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 20189 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 22:00:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 20180 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 22:00:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:00:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:00:09 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1O7bls-0006Ov-Qj for users@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:59:48 -0700 Message-ID: <28406253.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:59:48 -0700 (PDT) From: davis To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: STOMP queue names MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: davisford@gmail.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Why must stomp queues be prefixed with the string "/queue/" ? Is there any particular rhyme or reason to this naming strategy? The reason I ask is that I have implemented my own custom authentication and authorization plugins, and I have implemented a JMX Mbean that allows me to dynamically create queues and users with read/write permissions for those queues. Without going into a lot of detail, my implementation works great for openwire where there is no such naming requirement, but fails when I connect with a stomp client (i.e. user does not have ACL permission to read/write to queue), and it has something to do with the implementation of DefaultAuthorizationMap which is what I use as the backing implemenation for my authorization plugin. I think it has something to do with the prefix / child / etc. naming hierarchy -- where stomp queues are uniquely prefixed. I have not been able to fully grok what the issue is yet, but I was wondering if this particular issue may ring a bell for someone on the list -- would love to hear about it... -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/STOMP-queue-names-tp28406253p28406253.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.