Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.219 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=jOKYSNC+2cr+hoJ2yK2AohnMK9v/O31TA3FBLw3rl9xdX214FgX3UbmXYue2RShVd0
         JRjE8E1sha1b3lS1F4bS5ers0UUrbf1sSp15ovLCJwGU8kCRAX2UROmcOL1KGCSzAScD
         JEuwEESYU2sJeNhBvAkZQG1FqS5hWeRWD+BJM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fa74450c1003160841w3b09e647w3db3fdf68d6ad689@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fa74450c1003160841w3b09e647w3db3fdf68d6ad689@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:21:48 +0000
Message-ID: <3a73c17c1003180721m4a4f5b96q43e8b7bd2490014@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ and addConnector, addNetworkConnector
From: Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c118e81abb7048213f382

--0015174c118e81abb7048213f382
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

can you raise an issue for this, with the url you pass to
addNetworkConnector. I see some of the networkConnectors override the
getName method to make it unique but not all do.

On 16 March 2010 15:41, Ryan Moquin <fragility2.0@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was experimenting with adding network connectors to ActiveMQ through JMX.
> There is either a problem with the addConnector and addNetworkConnector
> methods or there is something I'm missing.  If you connect via JMX to
> ActiveMQ and call the addNetworkConnector JMX method, it works, the first
> time.  The return value from the method is "localhost".  The problem is
> that
> when you try to add a second one, the names conflict because that one is
> also called "localhost" and an exception is thrown.  It doesn't appear that
> there is any addNetworkConnector or addConnector methods that also take a
> name for the connector, are there?  Is there any other way to do this?
>
> I'm using Fuse ESB 4.2 and can no longer access the broker directly like I
> could in Fuse ESB 3.x.
>
> Ryan
>


-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com

--0015174c118e81abb7048213f382--