Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7228 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2010 17:57:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2010 17:57:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 45677 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 17:57:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 45608 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 17:57:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 45598 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2010 17:57:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:57:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:57:09 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NjcWW-0006kW-63 for users@activemq.apache.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:56:48 -0800 Message-ID: <27691468.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:56:48 -0800 (PST) From: Eric-AWL To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Too much "subscription MBeans" => OOM. In-Reply-To: <27685505.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: eric.vincent@atosorigin.com References: <27685385.post@talk.nabble.com> <27685505.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No. I don't understand. I'm not sure of the current configuration, but it's strange 2 groups of developers. One network of broker where each component has a transport and a network connector with the same multicast group On components developed by the first group of developers : 2341 ObjectNames (I think it's OK when I count my consumers, queues, topics, advisory queues ...) 146 MBeanServerNotifications On components developed by the second group of developers : 72049 Object Names. 127956 MBeanServerNotification I think the most of ObjectNames are the subscription MBeans. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Too-much-%22subscription-MBeans%22-%3D%3E-OOM.-tp27685385p27691468.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.