Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66156 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2010 15:18:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2010 15:18:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 61657 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2010 15:18:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 61627 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2010 15:18:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 61617 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2010 15:18:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:18:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:18:25 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NdPwa-000870-TI for users@activemq.apache.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:18:04 -0800 Message-ID: <27469269.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:18:04 -0800 (PST) From: samp To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: response never delivered using JMSCorrelationId In-Reply-To: <27466910.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: sam@brightcove.com References: <27462376.post@talk.nabble.com> <3a73c17c1002050055m40a77a31tbf7a496d1f8be223@mail.gmail.com> <27466910.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I forgot to mention that this configuration file is exactly the same on both brokers. I *think* that means I don't need it to be duplex, is that correct? In any case, my problem still happens regardless of the duplex setting. thanks sam -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/response-never-delivered-using-JMSCorrelationId-tp27462376p27469269.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.