activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Did Jencks amqpool turn into org.apache.activemq.pool?
Date Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:32:39 GMT
er - yes jencks is no longer recommended really.

On 21 Feb 2010, at 17:18, aaronriekenberg wrote:

>
> I notice on the camel activemq page there is a recommendation to use  
> the
> Jencks amqpool: http://camel.apache.org/activemq.html
>
> There is also a similar recommendation here:
> http://fusesource.com/docs/esb/3.3/jms/ESBJMSConnectFactoryAMQ.html
>
> But looking at the code for jencks amqpool
> (http://svn.codehaus.org/jencks/tags/jencks-parent-2.2/jencks-amqpool/src/main/java/org/jencks/amqpool/

> )
> and activemq's pool
> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/pool/

> )
> they look nearly identical.  Both provide JcaConnectionPool,
> PooledConnectionFactory, and XaPooledConnectionFactory.  The code is  
> also
> clearly related.
>
> Did Jencks amqpool get imported into activemq and turn into
> org.apache.activemq.pool?  If so maybe the camel documentation  
> should be
> updated to avoid confusion?
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Did-Jencks-amqpool-turn-into-org.apache.activemq.pool--tp27676866p27676866.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/






Mime
View raw message