I notice on the camel activemq page there is a recommendation to use the
Jencks amqpool: http://camel.apache.org/activemq.html
There is also a similar recommendation here:
http://fusesource.com/docs/esb/3.3/jms/ESBJMSConnectFactoryAMQ.html
But looking at the code for jencks amqpool
(http://svn.codehaus.org/jencks/tags/jencks-parent-2.2/jencks-amqpool/src/main/java/org/jencks/amqpool/)
and activemq's pool
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/pool/)
they look nearly identical. Both provide JcaConnectionPool,
PooledConnectionFactory, and XaPooledConnectionFactory. The code is also
clearly related.
Did Jencks amqpool get imported into activemq and turn into
org.apache.activemq.pool? If so maybe the camel documentation should be
updated to avoid confusion?
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Did-Jencks-amqpool-turn-into-org.apache.activemq.pool--tp27676866p27676866.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|