activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: activemq 5.3 slower than 4.1.2?
Date Sun, 07 Feb 2010 09:12:16 GMT
There's been a lot of changes - if you could provide a junit test case  
that is representative of your application - that would enable us to  
investigate the difference

On 7 Feb 2010, at 07:36, hwl wrote:

>
> Our application previously ran on activemq 4.1.2 and was able to  
> achieve <
> 500ms response time in average. However, some locking issue was  
> observed
> (WAITING on  
> edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.locks.CondVar)
> and we upgraded the activemq component to 5.3.0. The locking issue  
> does not
> occur so far, but the performance drops to >2 second on average  
> response
> time which breaches the performance critieria.
>
> Any idea what could introduce such significant overhead and any way  
> to tune
> it?
>
> Our messaging service is non-persistent and activemq has been  
> configured
> accordingly.
>
> thanks!
>
> - Wanling
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/activemq-5.3-slower-than-4.1.2--tp27486527p27486527.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/






Mime
View raw message