Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61839 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 16:49:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 16:49:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 17024 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 16:49:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 16991 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 16:49:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 16981 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 16:49:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:49:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:49:38 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NXdk6-0007LN-0v for users@activemq.apache.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:49:18 -0800 Message-ID: <27244867.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:49:18 -0800 (PST) From: rideallday To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: nic@uvic.ca References: <33FDEB0CE2F65F41A4CF8769247BB3668D30F583A4@EXVMBX016-3.exch016.msoutlookonline.net> <27234786.post@talk.nabble.com> rajdavies wrote: > > FileCursor and Kaha (which is > used by the AMQStore). - can you share the configuration you are using? > KahaDB isn't the same as Kaha > I'm still unsure... I'm using KahaDB, not AMQStore. I was about to go back to AMQStore as this setup just isn't working, but I really like the way that it works with the shared disk HA configuration. It's nice and simple. A quick explanation first: Data flows unidirectionally on a queue, communications and control are bi-directional on topics. The test config has 2 brokers, both in a shared disk HA setup, as described in the book. All 4 configs are the same, except for the obvious differences in transport and broker name. The /amq filesystem is NFS4 For my test I'm using the consumer and producer example that ships with AMQ. I have producer flow control enabled, but it's actually the consumers that are stalling. file:${activemq.base}/conf/credentials.properties -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/OOM-with-high-KahaDB-index-time-tp27217704p27244867.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.