Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42582 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 07:22:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 07:22:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 22724 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 07:22:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 22656 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 07:22:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 22646 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 07:22:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:22:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:22:43 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NUxYc-0006gO-7E for users@activemq.apache.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:22:22 -0800 Message-ID: <27140558.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:22:22 -0800 (PST) From: uprooter To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Request-response without clock sync MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: uprooter@gmail.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello. I have issue where I can't assure time synchronization between the broker and the clients. I'm using request response and all of my messages are lost if the client time is ahead of the broker time. What would be the right way of soving this problem if I still want to use request-response. ? Can I disable dropping of messages with old timestamps ? Or let client know that his time is in the future and he has to manipulate timestamps ? Why is this timestamps required anyway ? Many thanks -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Request-response-without-clock-sync-tp27140558p27140558.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.