activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Fernandez <joe.fernan...@ttmsolutions.com>
Subject Re: Non-persistent queue, asyncSend
Date Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:18:11 GMT

I am not comparing the throughput of non-persistent messages with persistent
messages that have asyncSend. I am just pointing out that your throughput
for sending persistent messages will improve if you send the persistent
messages with asyncSend. Question is, what is the risk-level of sending
persistent messages with asyncSend?

Joe


jongraf wrote:
> 
> Much appreciated Joe.  Let me get this straight: higher throughput with
> persistent messaging + asyncSend vs. non-persistent messaging?  It
> wouldn't be the same throughput?
> 
> 
> Joe Fernandez wrote:
>> 
>> Non-persistent messages are, by default, sent asynchronously (a.k.a.,
>> fire and forget). 
>> 
>> Yes, if you send persistent messages with asyncSend, you will realize a
>> nice boost in throughput. 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Non-persistent-queue%2C-asyncSend-tp27179026p27183017.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message