Return-Path: 
 <users-return-21739-apmail-activemq-users-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 71272 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2009 12:27:44 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Dec 2009 12:27:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 8796 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2009 12:27:43 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 8744 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2009 12:27:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@activemq.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@activemq.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.activemq.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 8734 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2009 12:27:43 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:27:43 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rajdavies@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.221.201 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.221.201] (HELO mail-qy0-f201.google.com)
 (209.85.221.201)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:27:41 +0000
Received: by qyk39 with SMTP id 39so2088732qyk.27
        for <users@activemq.apache.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:27:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
         :subject:date:references:x-mailer;
        bh=i+QzoGkZf1O1QWvgu+S3HluC6jsWljWndKUUqE9C0JA=;
        b=wdObYkoLqbl3HvZ2V6cMmDdt5nHuOGxDCIB+zaY1qJVP6a9yahc4P/AXcDLJRM9BWW
         Iryd3tVxwFyquJ/o9CRaWtliTfCqIgxj8C+gewed1NRJLCFUUeICsXW9TEDgyxqFW2nK
         qZOIiKbGY8hXMiaSZxccc44QPxkU8fonWvXoE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references
         :x-mailer;
        b=ufGFk4eo5QLa3OllRZL7IzxEiATFKKUZqRUtvifVKq7Gq5FlI0xEdWRNuJbPMqlibf
         jgWan7mkpnj+HvbI6Mow60d7Dl2zfegDydH9hAMfc1D4Cgrtq1UmbxXQSl6D71+OY9ao
         bXWcgX7N/VjPC/m0S77SAQGd/ZXDr9wP4MskU=
Received: by 10.224.97.30 with SMTP id j30mr3242464qan.244.1260880040259;
        Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:27:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.8.22? (goswell1.gotadsl.co.uk [213.208.100.103])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm4906965qyk.4.2009.12.15.04.27.18
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:27:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <5B2BB16E-4FDF-4FC7-822F-E8002F102ECC@gmail.com>
From: Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <26791867.post@talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: low persistent messaging performance using kahadb
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:27:11 +0000
References: <26747184.post@talk.nabble.com> <26779912.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <26791867.post@talk.nabble.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)

nice! - thx titexe
On 15 Dec 2009, at 09:21, titexe wrote:

>
> by putting this config KahaDB, I had the same performance as
> Kahapersistenceadaptor:
>
> <persistenceAdapter>
>      <kahaDB directory="${activemq.base}/data/kahadb"
> enableJournalDiskSyncs="false" indexWriteBatchSize="10000"
> indexCacheSize="1000"/>
> </ persistenceAdapter>
>
> titexe
>
>
>
> titexe wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> using kahaDB, could you have the same performance?
>>
>> Because I encounter the same problem, even using what in
>> ActiveMQ-througthput.xml
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> titexe
>>
>> Duro wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i've tested kahadb and kahaPersistenceAdapter using same simple test
>>> conditions i.e.
>>>
>>> - persistent queue
>>> - 3 consumers
>>> - 1 producer
>>> - 25 kb message size (10 000 msgs)
>>>
>>> according this, kahadb has troughput 22 msgs/s while
>>> kahaPersistenceAdapter 333 msgs/s. Similar difference observed using
>>> kahadb with amq 5.3, amq 5.4 snapshot and 5.3.1 snapshot. Why is  
>>> that? Is
>>> it possible to somehow configure kahadb (or message producer) to get
>>> better results?
>>>
>>> Duro
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/low-persistent-messaging-performance-using-kahadb-tp26747184p26791867.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/