Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <26776905.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:20:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Fernandez <joe.fernandez@ttmsolutions.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: low persistent messaging performance using kahadb
In-Reply-To: <26747184.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <26747184.post@talk.nabble.com>


You should get some improvement on the producer side if you set useAsyncSend
to true. 

If you have a relatively small number of destinations and high throughput is
important, the AMQ message store is the way to go. 

Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com


Duro wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> i've tested kahadb and kahaPersistenceAdapter using same simple test
> conditions i.e. 
> 
> - persistent queue
> - 3 consumers
> - 1 producer
> - 25 kb message size (10 000 msgs)
> 
> according this, kahadb has troughput 22 msgs/s while
> kahaPersistenceAdapter 333 msgs/s. Similar difference observed using
> kahadb with amq 5.3, amq 5.4 snapshot and 5.3.1 snapshot. Why is that? Is
> it possible to somehow configure kahadb (or message producer) to get
> better results?
> 
> Duro
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/low-persistent-messaging-performance-using-kahadb-tp26747184p26776905.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.