activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: license for javax.jms... and javax.management.... classes distributed with main activemq jar?
Date Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:37:25 GMT
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> We're trying to figure out how to properly license a distribution where we
> are including the apache-activemq-x.x.x.jar.
>
> This jar includes javax.jms... and javax.management... classes.
>
> Are these licensed under the Apache 2.0 license, or is a separate license
> needed for them?  I couldn't find any information in the license file in the
> binary distribution for these files, which appear to be part of the J2EE
> java platform.

Those spec implementations are from the Geronimo specs project
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/) and utilize the
Apache License 2.0. As Gary pointed out, the javax.management spec
classes come from the geronimo-j2ee-management impl here:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/

And the javax.jms spec classes come from the geronimo-jms impl here:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec/

See the LICENSE files for each project in the SVN repo URLs above.

The spec classes appear to be part of the J2EE platform because
they're interfaces for J2EE/Java EE specs which  were implemented by
the Geronimo team and are licensed using the Apache License. All of
which is 100% legal.

Bruce
-- 
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'

ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder

Mime
View raw message