activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: low persistent messaging performance using kahadb
Date Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:27:11 GMT
nice! - thx titexe
On 15 Dec 2009, at 09:21, titexe wrote:

>
> by putting this config KahaDB, I had the same performance as
> Kahapersistenceadaptor:
>
> <persistenceAdapter>
>      <kahaDB directory="${activemq.base}/data/kahadb"
> enableJournalDiskSyncs="false" indexWriteBatchSize="10000"
> indexCacheSize="1000"/>
> </ persistenceAdapter>
>
> titexe
>
>
>
> titexe wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> using kahaDB, could you have the same performance?
>>
>> Because I encounter the same problem, even using what in
>> ActiveMQ-througthput.xml
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> titexe
>>
>> Duro wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i've tested kahadb and kahaPersistenceAdapter using same simple test
>>> conditions i.e.
>>>
>>> - persistent queue
>>> - 3 consumers
>>> - 1 producer
>>> - 25 kb message size (10 000 msgs)
>>>
>>> according this, kahadb has troughput 22 msgs/s while
>>> kahaPersistenceAdapter 333 msgs/s. Similar difference observed using
>>> kahadb with amq 5.3, amq 5.4 snapshot and 5.3.1 snapshot. Why is  
>>> that? Is
>>> it possible to somehow configure kahadb (or message producer) to get
>>> better results?
>>>
>>> Duro
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/low-persistent-messaging-performance-using-kahadb-tp26747184p26791867.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/






Mime
View raw message