activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From forda <daniel.forb...@bredband.net>
Subject Re: Does'nt work to specify brokerurls with more than one param using &
Date Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:45:08 GMT

Hi !

Thanks. But of course i know. Does it mean it is not possible
to write like this:

failover://(tcp://brokerA:61616?tcpNoDelay=true,tcp://brokerB:61616?tcpNoDelay=true&inactivityDuration=0)?initialReconnectDelay=300&randomize=false&maxReconnectAttempts=10

Thanks in advance

Regards,

Daniel


bsnyder wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:30 AM, forda <daniel.forberg@bredband.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> We are using the failover transport, specifying serveral brokers with
>> more
>> than one parameter
>> per each url does'nt work, throws a PropertyIndex exception or something
>> similiar. I read about
>> this in the forum, but nowone seems to have an answer on that issue.
>> Does'nt
>> matter if i use the
>> TCPTransport or the OpenWire protocol.
>>
>> failover:(broker1?param1&param2, broker2?param3&param4)?param5
>>
>> Should'nt this work ? If not howto?
> 
> Below is a general example of a composite URI using the failover
> transport with a few parameters:
> 
> failover://(tcp://brokerA:61616,tcp://brokerB:61616)?initialReconnectDelay=300&randomize=false&maxReconnectAttempts=10
> 
> Bruce
> -- 
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
> 
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Does%27nt-work-to-specify-brokerurls-with-more-than-one-param-using---tp26691741p26699565.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message