Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bruce.snyder@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.216 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=u/RD0HPu6k+d5n+Fx2+bgM5eskDotlIB7V3YSvOT7XS2lru5bJu8mDP2LvkPb2CzhJ
         MzCPOG5YvEUgzq2qDW7ZEXjuxmUb/47Sggqt9hB4dt0/bf2xvBw2X8qMcMOLbuQgcz8K
         BjdZPZpkznB4jjOQDEentEwmkw1BW6kMH2LGg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <886461EE661A1E45BAA97AF28FAA85DB022CCE1E@barbados.corp.oversee.net>
References: 
 <886461EE661A1E45BAA97AF28FAA85DB022CCE1E@barbados.corp.oversee.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:44:34 -0700
Message-ID: <7b3355cb0911251044p414ade3mceae1fef35367ae6@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Best implementation for reply-request
From: Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Andres Rangel
<andresr@corp.moniker.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have currently running apache activemq 5.2 in a network of brokers
>
>
>
> It has close to 1500 producers and 1200 consumers.
>
> This producers have =A0each one a temporary queue so that will be 1500
> temp queues in the system.
>
>
>
> The reply-request is implemented using temporary queues.
>
>
>
>
>
> I would like to know if there's a performance hit by using temporary
> queues instead of using another option.
>
>
>
> What do you guys think?

There's more overhead involved with such constant creation/destruction
of temp queues, but that's it. As long as the broker has been tuned to
scale for handling such a large number of destinations, then you
should be OK:

http://activemq.apache.org/scaling-queues.html

Bruce
--=20
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=3D6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I=
;\"YC;VT*"
);'

ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder