Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <26163606.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:12:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Czaban <c@dgt.com.pl>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ - how to makes it stable - don't care about
 performance - what is the best practise?
In-Reply-To: <4AE63CAA.6020007@sophos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <26043857.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AE63CAA.6020007@sophos.com>


>What sort of instability are you seeing?  If there were some specific 
>areas than people could comment on how they've addressed them.

Producer can send the message, but consumer nothing get.
There is two ActiveMQ servers and C# clients with failover on.

>what hardware are you using? or virtualization?
Dell servers
>what os (for clients and server)?
Centos 4.4
>how many brokers are you intending to run and how will you network them?
Two.
>how many queues do you intend to use?
2000 queues
  - how many topics do you intend to use?
10 topics
  - how many producers or consumers are you expecting?
4000
  - what sort of message volume are you expecting?
less then 1kb
  - what protocol will you be using? jms, stomp, etc..?
openwire version 2

Best regards
Piotr

Czaban wrote:
> Hello, we would like to setup the instance of ActiveMQ 5.3 with the best
> factor of stability - we do not need high performance at all. What is the
> best practice and configuration for this issue?
> 
> Best regards
> Piotr 


-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ---how-to-makes-it-stable---don%27t-care-about-performance---what-is-the-best-practise--tp26043857p26163606.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.