activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 500ooo+ queues?
Date Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:34:17 GMT
Hi Aaron,

we've spent a lot time addressing file handles/startup time - ActiveMQ  
scales well in 5.3

cheers,

Rob
On 20 Nov 2009, at 11:40, Aaron Mulder wrote:

> It was my experience that ActiveMQ does not handle that well
> (destinations are not particularly "lightweight") and you'd do better
> to have a smaller number of destinations with selectors.  RAM is not
> the main/only issue -- file handles and startup time also caused
> problems.
>
> Thanks,
>    Aaron
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Igor Katkov <ikatkov@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it a good idea to create 500ooo+ queues and send messages to these
>> destinations? Load is a few messages per _minute_ into each queue.
>> Producers and consumers will be on different hosts. Network of  
>> brokers
>> topology.
>>
>> Does anyone have experience pushing ActiveMQ that far, or even  
>> further with
>> 2M queues and several messages a second?
>>
>> Will it scale to that extent? I can add boxes to host additional  
>> producers
>> and consumers, but not sure if pushing metadata of that mighty  
>> number of
>> queues around will be handled OK
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/500ooo%2B-queues--tp26417356p26417356.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>

Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/






Mime
View raw message