activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Mulder <ammul...@alumni.princeton.edu>
Subject Re: 500ooo+ queues?
Date Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:13:15 GMT
OK, I stand (well, sit) corrected.  :)

Thanks,
      Aaron

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> we've spent a lot time addressing file handles/startup time - ActiveMQ
> scales well in 5.3
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
> On 20 Nov 2009, at 11:40, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
>> It was my experience that ActiveMQ does not handle that well
>> (destinations are not particularly "lightweight") and you'd do better
>> to have a smaller number of destinations with selectors.  RAM is not
>> the main/only issue -- file handles and startup time also caused
>> problems.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>   Aaron
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Igor Katkov <ikatkov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is it a good idea to create 500ooo+ queues and send messages to these
>>> destinations? Load is a few messages per _minute_ into each queue.
>>> Producers and consumers will be on different hosts. Network of brokers
>>> topology.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have experience pushing ActiveMQ that far, or even further
>>> with
>>> 2M queues and several messages a second?
>>>
>>> Will it scale to that extent? I can add boxes to host additional
>>> producers
>>> and consumers, but not sure if pushing metadata of that mighty number of
>>> queues around will be handled OK
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://old.nabble.com/500ooo%2B-queues--tp26417356p26417356.html
>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>
> Rob Davies
> http://twitter.com/rajdavies
> I work here: http://fusesource.com
> My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
> I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message