Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34773 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2009 10:49:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2009 10:49:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 47402 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 10:49:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 47345 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 10:49:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 47335 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2009 10:49:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:49:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.201] (HELO mail-yw0-f201.google.com) (209.85.211.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:49:04 +0000 Received: by ywh39 with SMTP id 39so846976ywh.26 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:48:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RxfGl+Tj035QBnxlzigWOvQ94tai4EQtU5zKY9ZyjYQ=; b=EtwtWkenWJ6Sjj3WsBziHKUrKR4PtdJ3Uj/eDSrG1ZA32uqnhhA+VevGVe/ayMDCVn W/mW5ii1AcEsX/5Ze0L7jfuOpnLzhwh0lMBVRB5JgYIR61g/ecukKBSZ2G+uPJ9ovuCC IyU2H8sqbYxnQYk9+rWOTO/xeaHFA5SInidB4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gTl3kxEYhfiPge1h11+mzM3FBpplxFyzgbTJ3LQrbnHk5Exudhz+kVqkaPq5SEI/Ak oAxqhrlzwms6IGgf+huUoTYOXIWKF1M1CR8dC1qOhH2McCfgUGohJIUkAffpxEmdW92+ Fv0wC+dZu+46EpOAo7g9dGmyoluDOEMysq46k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.49.11 with SMTP id b11mr2909429ank.121.1255085323178; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:48:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <25811706.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <25811706.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:48:43 +0100 Message-ID: <3a73c17c0910090348i57dea971h91ebf345d2250827@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: What is the best way to benchmark the performance of activemq? From: Gary Tully To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org the perf plugins are in activemq-tooling module: cd activemq-tooling mvn install and the activemq-pref project is now in the sandbox: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/sandbox/activemq-perftest so svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/sandbox activemq_sandbox cd activemq_sandbox/activemq-perftest and run the mvn test commands from there. Some folks find the results hard to interpret but if you give it some time it is a useful tool. 2009/10/8 praveen.sharma : > > What is the best way to benchmark the performance of activemq? > > URL http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-performance-module-users-manual.html > describing "Running Maven 2 Performance Test" doesn't seem to work for me. > > Despite checking out the trunk, building the entire source code, I couldn't > find activemq-perf plugins. > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/What-is-the-best-way-to-benchmark-the-performance-of-activemq--tp25811706p25811706.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com