activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: HTTP Tunneling for Embedded Broker
Date Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:36:55 GMT
Hi,

did you check  HttpEmbeddedTunnelServlet and
HttpSpringEmbeddedTunnelServlet? It might be what you're looking for.

Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb

Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net


On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:34 AM, roman hawk <romanhawk@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I've the following use case:
> According to ActiveMQ docs and code, it is possible to open http transport
> from broker. Jetty server is started inside HttpTransportServer. Listener
> from HttpTransportServer is registered in HttpTunnelServlet, which is
> started inside Jetty.
>
> I have an embedded broker. It is running essentially inside my servlet
> container. So I'd like to reuse my servlet container (thus port 80) to open
> HttpTunnel. So it looks like correct approach is to start HttpTunnelServlet
> inside my container. The only connection with broker is
> TransportAcceptListener. I've obtained this listener from
> VMTransportServer,
> but I guess it is not the best approach (private field).
>
> What is the best approach from architecture perspective? Create my own
> transport? Use some Transport filter? Or am I missing something?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/HTTP-Tunneling-for-Embedded-Broker-tp26107111p26107111.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message