Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67529 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2009 12:01:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2009 12:01:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 96306 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 12:01:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 96246 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 12:01:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 96236 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2009 12:01:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:01:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.220 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.220] (HELO mail-fx0-f220.google.com) (209.85.220.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:01:28 +0000 Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so701212fxm.38 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:01:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=BIAUnWNyi83Tr/m8OzwlETvIkWxPzPkFl4I9ylLAw2k=; b=Bx6w9XKs/sa5o6Ap9lPviMsFniCG5q4+WMUU9HoeH56EhnpNCeNCBFX99qVbSDUN0c hcFdqfyZ769ySXf5yxnPCOeY8m7fHpSR/PdJVmeSlTXj0dDCox8GTZ3cQw0cM7RM33nD vTTGik4T1KOvoeWFQc95C/av8t3TopcpBwkaM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Way7lPgZwBWKH8eG87y+4qrkbN48wWxak3mvCPpLncjffy/sGJC1n45d008V687gqm ETe6yhmFvxPoLTSFNM+Tu1I9j/cR+4lQwTys8esFSu6YuAO8Y95MwLUQYyqXyHbxWXaJ w/DZrwO3spl3dW+hJosEtj5HfLt33rLPhciT0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.15.11 with SMTP id i11mr76020faa.105.1252497667479; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:01:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <25363310.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <25363310.post@talk.nabble.com> From: James Strachan Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:00:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Message Integrity To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2009/9/9 pa7751 : > > Hi > > I have a queue in ActiveMQ messagings server. There are two listeners(on > different machines), that are listening to the same queue. This is done for > faster processing of the messages in the queue. Will ActiveMQ ensure that > the same message is not received by both? Yes, ActiveMQ's queues act as a load balancer of messages across consumers. > Also will it ensure that both > listeners do not seek the same message from the queue? Yes See http://activemq.apache.org/how-does-a-queue-compare-to-a-topic.html -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/