Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29399 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2009 17:46:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2009 17:46:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 25878 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 17:46:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 25836 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 17:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 25826 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2009 17:46:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:46:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rajdavies@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.185] (HELO mail-yw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.211.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:46:17 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so1661021ywh.6 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:45:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=gsLorqC0WYxmFkh7dc8WRyuPzvlOeK7wspAzytiREjQ=; b=j2VQ0ebwNZXlj9yQpVJFPB0ct8iKqIcM/keqqyKT1ucrS4s8/SszKI/eJ99mtyVjmn 3usZDYj2H1LA3zMXhtN8sfBp5XmzwWdyCIiMho5kgCXx3Wt5XHBV0XBEhz/ma/G531F3 QJ8hGi1KUzTQ2FQeQLV2euXLYu7WLQ4nkD5Rg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=kvACGD1MZhT2Q/iuzjzoR+81v/uRFUJaNxOa1VjUwMFawQZ3RNh6CFoqT+upDSjyWu rWWgri9dseWO0JvhPBRzW7jZ3uNuMEwgRadkL3eI10BZ/8Zv7kCAk0XVdDnxDfh9WK+2 96eidyHwG1yIs5xQsc3LvxqvINTcdISdB3b1o= Received: by 10.90.45.19 with SMTP id s19mr277780ags.100.1252518356144; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.66? (host86-164-12-4.range86-164.btcentralplus.com [86.164.12.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 29sm533517agd.65.2009.09.09.10.45.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <4D508E2F-6884-4EF5-86F0-F1B081238499@gmail.com> From: Rob Davies To: users@activemq.apache.org In-Reply-To: <25369349.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Getting negative number of pending messages Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:45:51 +0100 References: <22106707.post@talk.nabble.com> <25295148.post@talk.nabble.com> <25299721.post@talk.nabble.com> <8D4FBEB6-66A9-497C-87FB-229E81BB4613@gmail.com> <25369349.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org just as a sanity check - can you try a 5.3 client to connect to the 5.3 broker? On 9 Sep 2009, at 18:10, magellings wrote: > > Okay I have 5.3 configured with the following config. I can't > connect from > another machine through the host name of the server however. This > config is > taken directly from an ActiveMQ 5.2 broker and running that broker I > can > connect just fine. Anyone know what's up? > > > > xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" > xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core" > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" > xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans > http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd > http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core > http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core.xsd > http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring > http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring/camel-spring.xsd"> > > > class > = > "org > .springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer"> > > file:///${activemq.base}/conf/credentials.properties value> > > > > brokerName="WAMQDEV1PRODUCTREQUEST" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/ > data"> > > > > > password="replenish" groups="producers,consumers,admins" /> > > > > > > > read="consumers" admin="admins,producers" /> > write="admins,producers" admin="admins,producers,consumers" /> > > > > > > > > > > > > > advisdoryForFastProducers="true" advisoryWhenFull="true" > memoryLimit="5mb"/> > > > > > > > > > > > directory="${activemq.base}/data" maxFileLength="20 mb"/> > > > > createTablesOnStartup="false" /> > > > > keyStorePassword="password" > trustStore="file:${activemq.base}/conf/broker.ts" > trustStorePassword="password"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discoveryUri="multicast://default"/> > > > > > destroy-method="close"> > value="com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver"/> > value="jdbc:sqlserver://CHALLENGER.qg.com: > 1433;databaseName=ActiveMQProductRequest;user=GL > $ACTIVEMQ_PRODUCTREQUEST;password=replenish"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/admin" logUrlOnStart="true"/> > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/camel" logUrlOnStart="true"/> > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/demo" logUrlOnStart="true"/> > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/fileserver" > logUrlOnStart="true"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rajdavies wrote: >> >> We are aiming to get a 5.3 release candidate to vote on next week - >> so >> no long >> On 4 Sep 2009, at 19:46, magellings wrote: >> >>> >>> Right now we're focusing pretty hard on stress testing version 5.2 >>> but we can >>> try and fit in a test. When is the estimated release date of >>> version 5.3? >>> In other words, how much time do we have? :) >>> >>> >>> rajdavies wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4 Sep 2009, at 15:14, magellings wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> We too were having problems were number of pending of messages >>>>> was a >>>>> negative >>>>> number and messages received was greater than number sent. We >>>>> determined >>>>> there were indeed duplicate messages being sent. >>>>> >>>>> We ended up setting useCache to false on the queue policy entry >>>>> and >>>>> the >>>>> problem appears to be resolved. >>>>> >>>>> We too were sending a high volume of messages to our queues >>>>> relatively >>>>> quickly. >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25295148.html >>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It would be great to know if you still had the problem on the >>>> latest >>>> 5.3 snapshot too >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> >>>> Rob Davies >>>> I work here: http://fusesource.com >>>> My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ >>>> I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25299721.html >>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> Rob Davies >> I work here: http://fusesource.com >> My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ >> I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25369349.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > Rob Davies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/