Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36861 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2009 18:07:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2009 18:07:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 63165 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 18:07:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 63116 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 18:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 63100 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2009 18:07:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:07:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.154 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.154] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:07:16 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1247815fgg.14 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:06:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LzMlyCiIMUkcjomfdzp5zBrwvfdJcZBpZFvNKKS5QqI=; b=aTmMdp3PG5BWaUjMl3ZfW5kr5wq9qm4TubvNly/TVmHnBfQ1UhGj4Ll8GmGr4LIaqc InXgP3dwrf96E7Tf0+LypmAWviMBMo739MfBxQq5fjFhyFKE4dn7Xqseik7p9kdnFMrR 08ON9rz0irmVCp4HVuqDwPZrifj4MFtfZ0tuc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=DvnwDwW7IFgbwysPdln+wWrGk2OmjfSqTF5giVeke4Blzjo9plsdCkkHxFDv/j+a37 yBreb+26yLFm/EczuJSSWZVfOY1xt387fRQ89gZoB20qwh7GhMZn/ktOKDTL0ix+KbGn a/UiJT3MHvYZ+6G8GL1A5eZjQfQwLFX37u2rg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.8.36 with SMTP id 36mr350329fgh.7.1252519614274; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:06:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3a73c17c0909091104q5b2ffd1h4fe7579eb6897017@mail.gmail.com> References: <22106707.post@talk.nabble.com> <25295148.post@talk.nabble.com> <25299721.post@talk.nabble.com> <8D4FBEB6-66A9-497C-87FB-229E81BB4613@gmail.com> <25369349.post@talk.nabble.com> <3a73c17c0909091104q5b2ffd1h4fe7579eb6897017@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:06:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3a73c17c0909091106nb54b04w3b0b93dc08bf191b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Getting negative number of pending messages From: Gary Tully To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0014853198daaedf94047328f208 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0014853198daaedf94047328f208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 just fyi: the jira is https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2094 2009/9/9 Gary Tully > with 5.3 "localhost" is local, not the wildcard address. you may need to > use the wildcard address "0.0.0.0" if you localhost is tied to a different > interface. > > 2009/9/9 magellings > > >> Okay I have 5.3 configured with the following config. I can't connect >> from >> another machine through the host name of the server however. This config >> is >> taken directly from an ActiveMQ 5.2 broker and running that broker I can >> connect just fine. Anyone know what's up? >> >> >> >> > xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" >> xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core" >> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" >> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans >> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd >> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core >> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core.xsd >> http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring >> http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring/camel-spring.xsd"> >> >> >> > >> class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer"> >> >> file:///${activemq.base}/conf/credentials.properties >> >> >> >> > brokerName="WAMQDEV1PRODUCTREQUEST" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data"> >> >> >> >> >> > password="replenish" groups="producers,consumers,admins" /> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > read="consumers" admin="admins,producers" /> >> > write="admins,producers" admin="admins,producers,consumers" /> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > advisdoryForFastProducers="true" advisoryWhenFull="true" >> memoryLimit="5mb"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > directory="${activemq.base}/data" maxFileLength="20 mb"/> >> >> >> >> > createTablesOnStartup="false" /> >> >> >> >> > keyStorePassword="password" >> trustStore="file:${activemq.base}/conf/broker.ts" >> trustStorePassword="password"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > discoveryUri="multicast://default"/> >> >> >> >> >> > destroy-method="close"> >> > value="com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver"/> >> > value="jdbc:sqlserver://CHALLENGER.qg.com:1433 >> ;databaseName=ActiveMQProductRequest;user=GL$ACTIVEMQ_PRODUCTREQUEST;password=replenish"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/admin" logUrlOnStart="true"/> >> > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/camel" logUrlOnStart="true"/> >> > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/demo" logUrlOnStart="true"/> >> > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/fileserver" logUrlOnStart="true"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> rajdavies wrote: >> > >> > We are aiming to get a 5.3 release candidate to vote on next week - so >> > no long >> > On 4 Sep 2009, at 19:46, magellings wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Right now we're focusing pretty hard on stress testing version 5.2 >> >> but we can >> >> try and fit in a test. When is the estimated release date of >> >> version 5.3? >> >> In other words, how much time do we have? :) >> >> >> >> >> >> rajdavies wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 4 Sep 2009, at 15:14, magellings wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> We too were having problems were number of pending of messages was a >> >>>> negative >> >>>> number and messages received was greater than number sent. We >> >>>> determined >> >>>> there were indeed duplicate messages being sent. >> >>>> >> >>>> We ended up setting useCache to false on the queue policy entry and >> >>>> the >> >>>> problem appears to be resolved. >> >>>> >> >>>> We too were sending a high volume of messages to our queues >> >>>> relatively >> >>>> quickly. >> >>>> -- >> >>>> View this message in context: >> >>>> >> http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25295148.html >> >>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> It would be great to know if you still had the problem on the latest >> >>> 5.3 snapshot too >> >>> >> >>> cheers, >> >>> >> >>> Rob >> >>> >> >>> Rob Davies >> >>> I work here: http://fusesource.com >> >>> My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ >> >>> I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25299721.html >> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> > >> > Rob Davies >> > I work here: http://fusesource.com >> > My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ >> > I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25369349.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > http://blog.garytully.com > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com --0014853198daaedf94047328f208--