Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bruce.snyder@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.218 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=sMMZ/ptnap7ueqD2PTx8aGe8Q1Rr9h/RhQ7MN1Fzz+5mb4gw5+jvjYBWjFvMZAapxl
         d1VXxdBdm1qQQECSPyDzFKELWEqNv8riijrw3BCbgKT6QExxVQw+1QgXDZ9DXt93c2aB
         mzG00FfMYrrSxmXLUhdXJCAbYDNkPnf3JBwrg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25095407.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <25088654.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <7b3355cb0908220908v2439fa58k70646a1e17bea655@mail.gmail.com>
	 <25095407.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:33:52 -0600
Message-ID: <7b3355cb0908221033w5f2ad66ct9556b53f43b1ab73@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ without J2EE
From: Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:36 AM, gonzus<gonzalo.diethelm@diethelm.org> wrote:
>
> Bruce, thanks again for your answers.
>
>
> bsnyder wrote:
>>
>>> geronimo-j2ee-management_1.0_spec-1.0.jar
>>> geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1.jar
>>> geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.0.1.jar
>>
>> Those JARs are just APIs for a given specification. In other words, those
>> JARs contain the interfaces put forth by each of those specs. The
>> j2ee-management spec deals with JMX, the JMS spec deals with JMS, the JTA
>> spec deals with transactionality. These JARs do not tightly couple
>> ActiveMQ with Java EE. ActiveMQ can be used with a Java EE container, a
>> web container or in a stand alone environment. In fact, the most popular
>> deployment style with ActiveMQ is stand alone.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Also, none of those JARs has anything to do with JNDI.
>>
>>> Would it be possible to use ActiveMQ without these JARs?
>>
>> No, the JMS spec requires the use of these specs.
>>
>
> Ok, that clears that up. Besides, I just checked those JARs and they are
> pretty small anyway.
>
>
> bsnyder wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way to develop ActiveMQ applications that do not use JNDI?
>>> Perhaps via Spring?
>>
>> Yes, the use of JNDI is not a requirement. ActiveMQ supports the use of
>> JNDI but does not require it.
>>
>
> Could you point me to a code example of using ActiveMQ (hopefully with
> Spring) outside any J2EE environment, that does not use JNDI? As close to a
> real life working project as possible?

There are some very basic examples in the examples directory of the
ActiveMQ binary distribution. Those are quite simplified and not
necessarily a good model for your own work.

I've got some examples of using the Spring JMS APIs that I'll send you offline.

Bruce
-- 
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'

ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder