Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <24965591.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Dehmlow <dehmlowm@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: setTransportlistener missing from activemq cpp
In-Reply-To: <1250206491.2660.14.camel@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <24961678.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <1250206491.2660.14.camel@localhost>


Timothy Bish wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:04 -0700, Michael Dehmlow wrote:
>> According to the failover docs for Java one should use the failover
>> transport
>> listener to receive notifications that a failover has occured. 
>> 
>> I can not find the interface to set a failover listener on the
>> ActiveMQConnectionFactory as suggested by the documentation.
>> 
>> Can you do this, and how?
>> 
>> 
>> If you use failover, and a broker dies at some point, your sends will
>> block
>> by default. Using TransportListener can help with this regard. It is best
>> to
>> set the Listener directly on the ActiveMQConnectionFactory so that it is
>> in
>> place before any request that may require an network hop.
> 
> The current official ActiveMQ-CPP 3.0.1 release does not offer this
> functionality.  If you want to pull down the trunk code the
> ActiveMQConnection class allows you to register a TransportListener on
> it that will have it transportInterrupted and transportResumed methods
> invoked when a failover occurs.
> 
> Regards
> Tim.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tim Bish
> http://fusesource.com
> http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Thanks Tim.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/setTransportlistener-missing-from-activemq-cpp-tp24961678p24965591.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.