Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54503 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 09:01:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 09:01:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 3218 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 09:02:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 3157 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 09:02:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 3147 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 09:02:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:02:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:01:53 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MO6YO-0006xC-VW for users@activemq.apache.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:01:32 -0700 Message-ID: <24369479.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 02:01:32 -0700 (PDT) From: tnine To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ActiveBlaze with .NET In-Reply-To: <5E7A397F-7DE5-47EC-BF68-E49FD9AC9E41@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: todd.nine@gmail.com References: <24366834.post@talk.nabble.com> <5E7A397F-7DE5-47EC-BF68-E49FD9AC9E41@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm still evaluating messaging systems, but this seems to be very close to what we need. Would it be possible for me to contribute .Net clients to this project? rajdavies wrote: > > Hi Todd, > > will be a while before we get round to doing a .NET client for blaze - > we want to stabilize the Java client first > > cheers, > > Rob > > On 7 Jul 2009, at 05:04, tnine wrote: > >> >> Hi all, >> I've recently had to pick up an existing .NET project. It's in C# >> 3.5. >> It's far too large to convert to Java, and we need something like >> ActiveBlaze as we have high throughput requirements. I'd like to >> deploy >> ActiveBlaze to begin with, is this possible with the .NET clients or >> not? >> >> Thanks, >> Todd >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/ActiveBlaze-with-.NET-tp24366834p24366834.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveBlaze-with-.NET-tp24366834p24369479.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.