Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gseben@gmail.com designates
 74.125.92.144 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=KQ436FfNMP9YGVOwF//hyBRC0jjJYa83lgyPkKmsg3mF6es1iOx4MXHZCRK9Wu3Szx
         clhNxKDRCLUF115J1odUP8VZdM4nknrDTCFPc2LWqsiVrtEFZqIlOXcMeSDiyS204MAh
         /3qzJ5vXYpz/uvQOcKSK85p3CvCtLQXtwLUdE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <23296281.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <23296281.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:26:14 -0400
Message-ID: <467bc4630904292026x1c6e9b05r214b97e295f20014@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Issues with Network of Brokers and Message Selectors
From: Giovani Seben <gseben@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016361640ad27c8f30468bd425b

--0016361640ad27c8f30468bd425b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Elliot,

This looks very similar to an issue fixed a couple of months ago. Check out:
http://fusesource.com/issues/browse/MB-438
or alternatively for AMQ:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2104

HTH,
-Giovani

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Elliot Barlas <elliotbarlas@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> I have been experimenting with the behavior of a network of two AMQ brokers
> and message selecting consumers.  As described in the AMQ documentation
> (http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html), consuming with
> message selectors in a broker network environment can lead to messages
> being
> trapped on one of the brokers.
>
> Setup:
> -2 AMQ Brokers connected by static URIs.  Using all default settings.
> -2 Producers, 1 connected to each Broker.
> -Each producer sends 100 non persistent, non expiring messages.
> -1 message selecting consumer connects to 1 Broker and consumes all
> matching
> messages.
> -Observation: the 100 messages from the other Broker (without the consumer)
> are transferred over, EVEN THOSE MESSAGES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE SELECTOR
> EXPRESSION.  THOSE MESSAGES ARE NOW TRAPPED ON THAT BROKER.
>
> How can I avoid transferring messages for which there is no consumer than
> can ACTUALLY consume the messages???
>
> I have condensed the experiment into a small Java class and attached it:
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p23296281/SelectorBrokerNetworkTest.java
> SelectorBrokerNetworkTest.java
>
> Thanks,
> Elliot
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Issues-with-Network-of-Brokers-and-Message-Selectors-tp23296281p23296281.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

--0016361640ad27c8f30468bd425b--