Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43806 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 08:35:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 08:35:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 17673 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 08:35:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 17608 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 08:35:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 17598 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 08:35:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:35:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.164 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.164] (HELO mail-ew0-f164.google.com) (209.85.219.164) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:35:05 +0000 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so2253009ewy.38 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:34:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+pz1ZnkvNxGrTmYZ0mjTR+P5tUsvlG/6fwysyLc+bDc=; b=eh4FVJwKRoCfsdwuXXNyiq3UXeKaoeWkobsit13XcpxzvBrWq/U92oZ8XobZ8xwmWN 83SRKiQhTK7xX4IKS4bGbmYkarly7UPxqYtMkwAvdVyE2YDxygMWD+E8Z1Fs4CWvb+na kyRNexKJR3UFzQUmvl8FUH80pdxd8GxyzwswI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=snrY6uQOvonbMzMoJ/I4Kq9vj8pekhUOT3Y7MPVZlHzXEljbQqPLyQUNul4xd+Do7E btcu0r92b3TyZnaU9Yu+XDTyfPNrZlwmgND+BwKUnEd1V0lYH8wt0J9/WH1NWrFUWuGI kiWzn4GpBqN7Gt0g61k12nNakLJhHXYnVCB7E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.210.137.14 with SMTP id k14mr3110499ebd.92.1239006884909; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:34:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <22904203.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <22870634.post@talk.nabble.com> <3a73c17c0904030915l520b2900l2e7327222e70a77e@mail.gmail.com> <22904203.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:34:44 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 33ba281a69da8ab4 Message-ID: <36e91d9d0904060134n60d68cd5ucbb75201bcdc19fc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Local and Distributed queues From: Dejan Bosanac To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c11a63fd3fa0466dec55b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174c11a63fd3fa0466dec55b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, sure, you can use something like Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:21 AM, L.Daigremont wrote: > > Thanks for this help, I'll test that trick > > I've got another question on this: Is this parameter wildcard friendly ? > Can I define for example that all queues named "_local_foo" would be the > local ones ? > > > Gary Tully wrote: > > > > check out the "excludedDestinations" attribute of a network xml > > configuration , > using > > this you can define local destinations that will not be distributed. This > > attribute is a list or queues and or topic names. > > > > Check out an example configuration from the unit tests: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/resources/org/apache/activemq/network/duplexLocalBroker.xml?view=markup > > > > 2009/4/3 L.Daigremont > > > >> > >> We would elaborate a distributed broker topography in which brokers can > >> also > >> have "Local queues" e.g non-distributed queues which can actually be > used > >> only into a local context. > >> > >> Is it existing a way to do that the broker could contain as well > >> distributed > >> queues which can be read by other brokers of the network of brokers, and > >> local queues only readable by the relevant broker. > >> (with configuration, while creating queues or any other way) > >> > >> Thx > >> LD > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/Local-and-Distributed-queues-tp22870634p22870634.html > >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > http://blog.garytully.com > > > > Open Source SOA > > http://FUSESource.com > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Local-and-Distributed-queues-tp22870634p22904203.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --0015174c11a63fd3fa0466dec55b--