Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <23217832.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric-AWL <eric.vincent@atosorigin.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Queue/Topic name length and performance ?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hi everybody

Has the queue/topic name length an impact on performance ?

I explain.

I used selectors on queue/topics to address specific consumers. I tried to
use ConsumerEventSource to track consumers starts and stops ... But I could
no longer use my selectors because ConsumerEventSource are associated to
queue and topics without selector filter. So I created dynamic queues and
topics with longer names (they include the selector value which can be long)

Ex of name :
"CATE-CHARGE-ReponseCharge-chargebusClient(ytsvmx01s.priv.awl.fr)"

It works but I'm badly surprised that my performance are worse than with
selectors although I believed that selectors were not very performant. (From
22seconds to 25seconds).

(It's possible my new ConsumerEventSource listeners are the real reason of
the performance decrease)

Has someone some precision to tell me about ?

Thank you
Eric-AWL
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Queue-Topic-name-length-and-performance---tp23217832p23217832.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.