Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <22586154.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Postol <ftpftp@centrum.cz>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which types to use - org.apache.activemq namespace or javax.jms
 namespace
In-Reply-To: <22565163.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <22565163.post@talk.nabble.com>


Sorry for that stupid question:) - it is clear now.


Postol wrote:
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> maybe it is a stupid question, but I am little bit confused, which objects
> should be used, when I am developing clients, which will communicate with
> ActiveMQ broker.
> 
> I am not sure if I should use types from org.apache.activemq namespace or
> from javax.jms namespace.
> 
> I know, that javax.jms namespace is original jms implementation and am not
> sure what happens if I use types from org.apache.activemq namespace (eg.
> ActiveMQSession, ActiveMQQueue, ActiveMQTopicPublisher etc.). 
> 
> Which one should I use in client implementation?
> 
> Is there any difference? I can see that types from org.apache.activemq
> namespace have more members and methods that ones from javax.jms
> namespace. Is it correct and safe to use all types from
> org.apache.activemq namespace?
> 
> Thanks and regards,
> 
> Postol
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-types-to-use---org.apache.activemq-namespace-or-javax.jms-namespace-tp22565163p22586154.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.