Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bmurphy1976@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.128.186 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=sBMM7VL+KebzDNt7DAGN+Z5Cx952vTZifOBSf5RziKezlfJvo3nOXydG7ZamvZGoUe
         JbslVFGg3rnq0WatLxZI14rgEW5roHdyz/u0ieh02DTG0e3N5d0ep2nVI+R7aEFXOBD7
         CIxzPcngze0Kv4CrU8lFwOvQtoTeU+u+/hTz0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5a56ce1b0901290900v3ce6ac03vab01358bd65f0679@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7fd310d10812291502w72db90f0ra70d2a1b3ecfa953@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5a56ce1b0901290900v3ce6ac03vab01358bd65f0679@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:56:52 -0600
Message-ID: <7fd310d10902030856n6852eafek7a08b5aeb54f0572@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Transactional Send Messages (NMS)
From: Bryan Murphy <bmurphy1976@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Essentially two phase commit.  We keep running into the problem where
our message are handled before the producer can commit it's
transaction to the database, therefore the consumer does not see the
correct data.  We currently work around this by either putting a sleep
delay at the beginning of the consumer (bad), or by sending the
messages after the transaction commit (lots of extra buggy code),
neither of which am I particularly happy with as a long term solution.

Bryan

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by participating inside a transaction.  Are you
> talking about implementing a two-phase commit extended transaction
> operation?  Or are you talking about using the transaction acknowledgment
> mode that is part of NMS?
>
> - Jim
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Bryan Murphy <bmurphy1976@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there a way I can have the sending of messages to a message queue
>> participate inside a transaction while using C# and NMS?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bryan
>>
>