activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Stanley <dstanl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Messages rollback
Date Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:44:08 GMT
Yes - it looks like there was a bug fixed in the transaction support [1] so
you would need the 2.2 release [2] of the C++ API for the transacted session
capabilities.

[1] http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-174
[2] http://activemq.apache.org/cms/activemq-cpp-22-release.html

Regards
/Dave

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:07 PM, jzhang1 <jian.zhang@etrade.com> wrote:

>
> Thanks very much for the information.  For the C/C++ sender and receiver,
> does stomp provide the similar functionality as JMS session ?
>
>
>
>
> Dave Stanley wrote:
> >
> > You can created a transacted jms session and either commit() or
> rollback()
> > that session. See:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/JmsTransactionTestSupport.java?view=markup
> >
> > Regards
> > /Dave
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:45 PM, jzhang1 <jian.zhang@etrade.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> ActiveMQ guru,
> >>
> >> I am curious whether ActiveMQ broker provide backout
> >>
> >> all enqueue and dequeue functions calls that have occurred since the
> last
> >> syncpoint are to be backed out. Messages put as part of a unit of work
> >> are
> >> deleted; messages retrieved as part of a unit of work are reinstated on
> >> the
> >> queue.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Messages-rollback-tp21968419p21968419.html
> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Messages-rollback-tp21968419p21980374.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message