activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From hackingbear <>
Subject AMQ Persistence vs Kaha: Re: Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1
Date Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:42:11 GMT

OK, I nailed down the problem (and update the bug.) The default AMQ
Persistence store shipped with 5.2 is very slow. Clean out the data
directory wouldn't help. Switching over to Kaha works.

now, before the problem is fixed. I want to know what are the plus and minus
of using kaha store, comparing to AMQ Persistence store. 


hackingbear wrote:
> Test case written, bug filed.

View this message in context:
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at

View raw message