activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Danilo Tuler <tu...@ideais.com.br>
Subject DefaultMessageListenerContainer with PooledConnectionFactory
Date Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:49:41 GMT

Hi,

I've read several references and posts like [1], [2] and [3], to decide
which should I use, DefaultMessageListenerContainer or
SimpleMessageListenerContainer.

Once I decide to go with DefaultMessageListenerContainer, should I use a
plain ConnectionFactory or a PooledConnectionFactory?

DMLC loops a call to receive, which may create a new connection and session
on each call. On the other hand using a PooledConnectionFactory may raise
issues that I'm not aware of.
Any thoughts?

[1] http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/jms.html
[2] http://activemq.apache.org/jmstemplate-gotchas.html
[3] http://forum.springframework.org/archive/index.php/t-33037.html

Thanks,
Danilo



-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DefaultMessageListenerContainer-with-PooledConnectionFactory-tp22038633p22038633.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message