Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.170.190 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=sCLaAOIs9r/+1Vn5TfFTHTQRh7Ih4GnaK4j1ZtMmDXHICmvV+qbkRfdWYjKTPEHvXi
         dm7LKgBaAI8Xmf6IHI+a73R0vdQT0yWTdEpiFXDmqmzfFZtg8/e1SWyDVLx7iaAv8q2R
         A+9LH67ilDa8OCdrh7wiHGva4OoCM40W32h50=
Message-ID: <ec6e67fd0812050243t743d74f7v6a9b9729dc5645ce@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:43:06 +0000
From: "James Strachan" <james.strachan@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Load balancing problem
In-Reply-To: <D12ADDB3-D45F-42DE-93D5-DD7A169C8F77@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20833487.post@talk.nabble.com> <20850053.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <D12ADDB3-D45F-42DE-93D5-DD7A169C8F77@gmail.com>

2008/12/5 Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com>:
>
> On 5 Dec 2008, at 09:03, zunrise wrote:
>
>>
>> Isn't their anyone who can help me. The problem is as mentioned
>>
>> http://activemq.apache.org/i-do-not-receive-messages-in-my-second-consumer.html
>> here
>> "The solution to this problem is to configure the pre-fetch value to
>> something smaller - such as 1, start the consumers together or publish the
>> messages after the consumers have started."
>> Again my solution have do balance the load also over allready existing
>> consumers in the queue. Is it imposible or do I make something wrong. Need
>> still help.
>>
>> Denis
>>
>> P.S.: Thank you James for your quick reply.
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Load-balancing-problem-tp20833487p20850053.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
> The best solution is to set the prefetch size to 0 - so your consumers pull
> messages from the broker.
> I don't understand why that is a problem ?

I'm not sure if NMS supports setting the prefetch value on the
destination using the URI notation does it?

-- 
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com/