Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <20885825.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:59:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Sodan <sodan@sodan.dk>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions about getCMSReplyTo
In-Reply-To: <1228490942.3592.1.camel@office>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <20853339.post@talk.nabble.com> <20854546.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <1228486764.7539.58.camel@office> <20855709.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <1228490942.3592.1.camel@office>


all works fine!

thanx
S=C3=B8ren


Timothy Bish wrote:
>=20
> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 07:06 -0800, Sodan wrote:
>> So if I do
>> Message *clone =3D message->clone();
>> and then later (out of scope) clone the dest,
>> then that should be safe also, right ?
>>=20
>> thanx
>> S=C3=B8ren
>=20
> Yes, all clone operations in ActiveMQ-CPP perform deep copies, so
> anything you clone you can assume that the internal data is independent
> of the original and can be cloned itself without worrying about lifetime
> of the original object.
>=20
> -Tim
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Tim Bish
> http://fusesource.com
> http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20

--=20
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Questions-about-getCMSR=
eplyTo-tp20853339p20885825.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.