Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14538 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2008 09:04:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2008 09:04:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 31644 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2008 09:04:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 31248 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2008 09:04:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 31233 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2008 09:04:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:04:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:02:43 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L8Waw-0002Kf-8d for users@activemq.apache.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:03:30 -0800 Message-ID: <20850053.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:03:30 -0800 (PST) From: zunrise To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Load balancing problem In-Reply-To: <20833487.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: denis@artkontrast.de References: <20833487.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Isn't their anyone who can help me. The problem is as mentioned http://activemq.apache.org/i-do-not-receive-messages-in-my-second-consumer.html here "The solution to this problem is to configure the pre-fetch value to something smaller - such as 1, start the consumers together or publish the messages after the consumers have started." Again my solution have do balance the load also over allready existing consumers in the queue. Is it imposible or do I make something wrong. Need still help. Denis P.S.: Thank you James for your quick reply. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Load-balancing-problem-tp20833487p20850053.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.