On 3 Dec 2008, at 10:34, WhiteSock wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> 1
> a) Create a new connection & session for every consumer which wants to
> receive message from a destination.
> b) Multiple consumer share the same connection & session.
> Is there any difference (such as performance) between a & b ?
>
> 2 When I create a consumer to receive message, I found the following  
> threads
> running on the background:
>  * Thread [ActiveMQ Transport: tcp://localhost/127.0.0.1:61616]  
> (Running)
>  * Thread [InactivityMonitor ReadCheck] (Running)
>  * Thread [InactivityMonitor WriteCheck] (Running)	
>  * Thread [ActiveMQ Session Task] (Running)
>  Is there any chance that I can set these threads' name (because I  
> create a
> new connection & session for each consumer, I want to set these  
> threads'
> name to the destination name which they susbcribed to)?
>
> Cheers.
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-ActiveMQ%27s-worker-thread-tp20810431p20810431.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

The InactivityMonitor threads belong to the Transport - currently  
there isn't a way of setting there names - as they are constructed  
before the connection clientId is set.
If you raise an issue on our issue tracker (or better still - submit a  
patch!) - we'll see if we can get this in the next release


cheers,

Rob

Rob Davies
http://fusesource.com
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/