activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From selezovikj <semir.elezo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Commons-logging conflict with failover
Date Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:44:02 GMT

If so, does this mean that by default, with the failover transport
commons-logging logs to where it tries to connect ? 



James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> 2008/11/4 selezovikj <semir.elezovic@gmail.com>:
>>
>> So failover tries to log that it is connected, but it cannot log since it
>> is
>> not connected.
>> But, my question is: connected where ?
>> Why doesn't failover log locally that it is connected ? Why can't it log
>> without being connected ? It can just log locally.
> 
> It logs with commons-logging. Its up to you to define where these log
> messages go (locally versus remotely over JMS etc).
> 
> Did you try Dejan's suggestion?
> 
> -- 
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
> 
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Commons-logging-conflict-with-failover-tp20323028p20324814.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message