activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Does using transactions on jms consumer lowers the performance?
Date Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:16:51 GMT
I didn't notice the cross post to different lists - here's my answer
in the servicemix thread...
http://cwiki.apache.org/SM/discussion-forums.html#nabble-p20106028


2008/10/22 pratibhaG <pratibha.ghogale@in2m.com>:
> Click to flag this post
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Nabble-From: pratibha.ghogale@in2m.com
>
>
> To use transactions I have kept a property transacted="jms" on jms consumer.
> I found the performance is lowered after this. It affected my load testing.
> I can not process 50 parallel requests with 1000 total now which was
> possible earlier.
> Is it really because of Transactions? I have not changed anything else in
> the configuration.
>
> What can I do to resolve this?
>
> please help
>
> -----Pratibha
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-using-transactions-on-jms-consumer-lowers-the-performance-%0D%0AClick-to-flag-this-post-tp20104658p20104658.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com/

Mime
View raw message