activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bruce Snyder" <bruce.sny...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Message Persistance Question
Date Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:53:48 GMT
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, jmychasiw <jmychasiw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Greetings:
>    We are currently evaluating ActiveMq 5.x
>
>    We are trying to decide between AMQMessageStore and jdbc persistence to
> Oracle. The documentation seems to advocate for AMQMessageStore over jdbc.
> Our project requires that massages cannot be lost.
>
> What are reasons that I would pick one over the other?

The reason for this is that persistence to JDBC can be very slow,
especially when compared to the AMQ Message Store.

Bruce
-- 
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'

Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/

Blog: http://bruceblog.org/

Mime
View raw message