Yeah, the web console is terrible. I don't trust it all anymore. Which kind
of sucks because reported numbers like pending count, number of consumers,
etc are nice to know.
Sigh, I'll try testing it again with a test queue and see if the load
balancing is happening correctly.
Thanks for the help,
-- Joel
ammulder wrote:
>
> I don't see anything obviously wrong with the config files. I
> normally give each networkConnector a unique name attribute, but I
> don't think that would cause it to not work. I don't typically use
> the Web console, though (I think issues like the negative message
> count are known) -- to test it "the old-fashioned way" I'd just send
> messages to one of the brokers and attach listeners to both brokers
> and make sure each listener sees some messages. You may have to send
> a large number of messages to see significant "load balancing" across
> the network, though. (I know there are some settings that affect
> this, but as I recall the default is not to always send messages to
> local clients so I would expect to see some load balancing happening.)
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Store-and-forward-not-working--tp19937282p19965293.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|