activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hans Bausewein <ha...@comerwell.xs4all.nl>
Subject Re: Pure Master/Slave Problem
Date Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:31:38 GMT


Olee wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion. I have other questions.
> 
> So the problem is due to multithread and deadlock on the slave? 
> Do you think pure master/slave is applicable? Or is asyncronization
> problem very often in version 5.1?
> 

My guess is that it is not as much used as the other master/slave setups. 

I'm not sure your problem is the same as (or even similar to) mine, but I
think it's worth to investigate.
I could not use 5.1.0 at all in pure master/slave setup.


Olee wrote:
> 
> BTW, in the management web->Home, there are 3 quota usage parameter: 
> Store percent used  	0
> Memory percent used 	0
> Temp percent used 	0
> 
> What is the meaning of the first and third one? It seems only memory
> percent used increased in my test...
> 
> 

I guess "Store" is the persistent store that's used when you specify
Message.JMSDeliveryMode as DeliveryMode.PERSISTENT

"Temp percent" I don't know.


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Pure-Master-Slave-Problem-tp19851956p19856168.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message