activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Gomes" <e.se...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Discuss: strong naming of NMS assemblies
Date Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:59:06 GMT
I guess there aren't any strong feelings one way or the other on this topic.
 That makes the decision easy then.  I have logged JIRA AMQNET-115 to
address this issue.
- Jim

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would like to get people's feedback on strong naming of the NMS
> assemblies.  I am working on releasing NMS 1.0, and this is now a
> priority issue.  I would like to hear some arguments for having strong
> named assemblies, other than "Microsoft recommends it."
>
> I think strong naming these assemblies causes more problems than any
> potential benefits.  I would like to turn off the strong naming, and
> go with the standard weak naming.
>
> Thoughts/arguments for/against?
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message