activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mittler, Nathan" <>
Subject RE: Using decaf API in user code?
Date Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:25:27 GMT
Hi Marc,
I'm glad to see you're interest in decaf - we've worked hard to make
programming in C++ painless (well, maybe less painful) to Java
developers :)

As far as the stability of the decaf API goes, I think at this point the
dust has settled a bit and we don't really have any plans for changing
APIs - adding to them perhaps, but not changing.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: MarcSchroeder []
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 7:55 AM
> To:
> Subject: Using decaf API in user code?
> Hi,
> as a Java programmer who needs to write a wrapper around ActiveMQ-CPP
> C++, I am of course very happy to see familiar concepts such as
> "synchronized()" available as part of the "decaf" namespace under
> ActiveMQ-CPP 2.2.
> Indeed, when mixing threads between ActiveMQ and my code, I guess it
is a
> good idea to use the same threading mechanism as ActiveMQ, so reusing
> stuff from decaf::util::concurrent seems like the right thing to do.
> So here is my question: How stable can I expect the 'decaf' API to be?
> it
> safe for me to use this, i.e., can I hope that changes to the decaf
API in
> future versions of ActiveMQ-CPP will be backward-compatible?
> I am asking because of the incompatible API change between
> 2.1
> and 2.2.
> Thanks for this nice piece of software, and best regards,
> Marc
> --
> View this message in context:
> user-code--tp19436487p19436487.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at

This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain information that is confidential
or privileged. Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient,
you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message. If you have received this
email in error, please delete and advise immediately.

View raw message