activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Failover ActiveMQ
Date Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:59:29 GMT
it will be available in 5.2
On 4 Sep 2008, at 15:54, greenapple wrote:

>
> Is this feature available yet?
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Gary Tully wrote:
>>
>> see the broker waitForSlave option introduced in
>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-596
>> this allows a master to know it is a master and to not accept
>> connections until a slave has attached.
>>
>> it does not fix the problem of replicating old/existing state but it
>> does allow the situation to be avoided.
>>
>> 2008/9/3 Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com>:
>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:55 PM, greenapple <ztuffaha@gmail.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your response Bruce,
>>>>
>>>> My question is regarding messages that were on the master before  
>>>> the
>>>> slave
>>>> connected. Is there a way to sync those?
>>>>
>>>> Assume the following:
>>>> 1. Master starts up
>>>> 2. Client publish 20 messages
>>>> 3. Slave starts up
>>>> 4. Messages from now onwards are replicated
>>>>
>>>> My question: is there a way to replicate the messages in (2)?
>>>
>>> To my knowledge, that's not possible using master/slave if the
>>> messages on the master have already been acked to the producer. But
>>> I'm sure this could be done using Camel to manually replicate any
>>> pending messages on the master broker to the slave broker.
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>> --
>>> perl -e 'print
>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>> );'
>>>
>>> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
>>> Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
>>> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
>>>
>>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Failover-ActiveMQ-tp19297718p19310834.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


Mime
View raw message