Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of e.semog@gmail.com designates
 209.85.198.240 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=oY4+so+0iEa1WIPBpRevVfvqLEl8l2a87ImpYno/zI88urS5DnDO7oDmEdfzeZQpr4
         bEEB401EOYbaoywqHw+5r3X/c53dh9ks6q8ylOWzBBoy52zqGIaqG1yeG2t9E+wZhNLZ
         mbeynuLG7CFjG/rGxDLinuQKGcEAojREXvCCo=
Message-ID: <5a56ce1b0808271619w5fb92923x9fde62b500f3989c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:19:01 -0700
From: "Jim Gomes" <e.semog@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: NMS: how to get list of messages?
In-Reply-To: <6e8974e40808261434o74b4b6f3t9c933f70a2ab31f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <6e8974e40808261434o74b4b6f3t9c933f70a2ab31f@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Vadim,

There is no way of iterating through the messages that are currently
in a queue.  The closest you can get is to turn on queue mirrors
(http://activemq.apache.org/mirrored-queues.html).  There is an
enhancement scheduled for NMS 1.1 to add QueueBrowser() as detailed in
Jira issue AMQNET-97.

Currently, there isn't an API for getting a list of extant queues.  I
think this functionality is more administrative in nature and should
be included in a package that has been discussed and referred to as
NMX.  This package is not being actively developed, though, as no
definite feature scope has been created for it.

-Jim


On 8/26/08, Vadim Chekan <kot.begemot@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I use c# client (NMS) and want to iterate through list of messages
> without removing them from the queue. Is it possible?
> Also is it possible to get list of queues using NMS library?
>
> --
> From RFC 2631: In ASN.1, EXPLICIT tagging is implicit unless IMPLICIT
> is explicitly specified
>